Housing Aid, Election Reforms, and Vision Zero on Rockville’s September 8 Agenda

Rockville’s Mayor and Council is returning from its August break facing a packed agenda with decisions that could shape the city’s future for years to come. At the September 8 meeting, three major issues will take center stage: housing affordability and federal funding priorities, a complete overhaul of the city’s election code, and progress on Rockville’s ambitious Vision Zero traffic safety plan. Each of these topics speaks directly to the daily lives of residents and businesses, raising questions about how Rockville grows, governs, and protects its people.
Rockville Council to Hear Public Testimony on Housing Needs and Federal Grant Priorities
The Rockville City Council will hold a public hearing to shape how the city will spend its $263,000 allocation of federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for FY 2027. The grants, distributed through Montgomery County, must be used for projects that benefit low- and moderate-income residents.
In the past, Rockville has used CDBG funding to rehabilitate supportive housing at Jefferson House, upgrade shared recovery housing, replace failing HVAC systems at David Scull Courts, and fund its single-family rehab program. With housing affordability worsening, this year’s hearing carries added weight.
A recent city needs assessment underscores the challenge: nearly half of Rockville residents are renters, and more than half of them are cost-burdened, paying over 30 percent of their income on housing. Median rent has climbed to $2,244 per month, requiring an income of nearly $90,000, while the median home price now tops $681,500. Homeownership rates continue to fall, particularly for younger and first-time buyers.
Continue reading →Candidates Share Their Vision for Rockville at October 5, 2023 Forum
Community Reach of Montgomery County, in partnership with Rainbow Place Shelter, hosted a Rockville Election 2023 Candidate Forum at the F. Scott Fitzgerald Theatre on October 5, 2023. The Forum, which was a significant event in the lead-up to the November election, saw candidates take to the stage to present their qualifications, experiences, and key policy positions. It’s important to note that the candidates’ statements were not independently verified, or as Ronald Reagan loved to say, “trust but verify.”
Candidate forums are a valuable opportunity for voters to hear directly from the candidates on a range of important issues but if you didn’t attend or don’t have time to watch the 90-minute replay on YouTube, I’m offering ChatGPT-generated summaries (with some light editing) to the candidates’ responses to the major questions in the attached six-page handout (thanks TM!). This will enable you to swiftly share your preferred candidate’s stance on issues with friends and family, strategize on the optimal choices for Mayor and Council seats, or potentially identify which candidates may be unclear, evasive, or inconsistent in their responses.
If you’re a candidate, these summaries could serve as a tool for reviewing your positions and assessing how effectively you stand out from others. Do the summaries accurately capture your ideas? Did any crucial points get overlooked? How do your views align or differ from other candidates? Are your statements well-rounded, or do they lean towards being too abstract or too specific? Do any of your opponents exhibit a significant lack in knowledge or critical thinking?
A Week of Surprises on Rockville’s Campaign Trail

It’s been a very strange week on Rockville’s campaign trail, starting on Monday at the Mayor and Council meeting and ending with a conversation in the parking lot after the Candidate Forum on Thursday night.
The Mayor and Council meetings often start with a half hour of proclamations highlighting a particular person, anniversary, or community issue, each read out by a council member without any drama. The October 2, 2023 meeting followed this tradition with the 45th Anniversary Art in Public Places Program, Arts and Humanities Month, Breast Cancer Awareness Month, Domestic Violence Awareness Month, Indigenous Peoples’ Day, and Walktober but things went strangely awry. In the agenda, David Myles was assigned to Domestic Violence Awareness Month, an ironic choice give his recent arrest for an assault on his wife. That must have caught someone else’s attention in City Hall because Myles was reassigned to Breast Cancer Awareness Month at the last minute. Council Member Myles, who participated in the meeting remotely, didn’t agree with the change and voiced his concerns during his presentation, and then proceeded to discuss domestic violence instead of reading the proclamation on breast cancer awareness. Mayor Newton attempted to interrupt him but they merely wound up talking over each other, making an uncomfortable mess, leaving it to the Mayor to read the proclamation on Breast Cancer Awareness Month. You can watch this unfold online at “Proclamation Declaring October 2023, at Breast Cancer Awareness Month (CM Myles).”

The Candidate Forum on Thursday, October 5 hosted by Community Reach of Montgomery County with Rainbow Place Shelter at the F. Scott Fitzgerald Theatre demonstrated the extraordinary challenge that voters will have when faced with a dozen council candidates. Although we’re mid-season, most candidates haven’t managed to distinguish themselves and are relying far too much on platitudes and vague statements about leadership, neighborhoods, vacancies, residents, funding, taxes, transparency, experience, city services, safety, housing, green space, diversity, partnerships, and sustainability, so they all seem to offer the same ideas and solutions. Here are some potential distinctions among them, but can you identify who they are (and more importantly, does it matter?):
- “I’m the only candidate that lives in Town Center.”
- “I led the effort to tie funding for our needs-based organizations to the cost of inflation.”
- “There’s a need for more live music in Town Center and throughout the city of Rockville.”
- “While on the Charter Review Commission…[I] routinely brought up the issues of justice and equity.”
- “I am disappointed in the vacancies in Town Center.”
Confusing matters, many talked out of two sides of their mouth: “we’re doing well on diversity but need to do more” or “we are a safe community but must hire more police” or “we need more live music and parks but we have to reduce expenses.” Part of it is due to the pressure to avoid alienating potential voters, but it’s also due to the nature of Candidate Forums: demanding simple answers to complex questions. At the Forum, a couple candidates had 90 seconds to answer:
- What are the problems you currently see facing Town Center and how do you intend to address them?
- Nonprofit organizations cover many services for city residents that Rockville helps to fund through grants. Is there too much funding going to nonprofits or not enough? Is the city funding the most important services? Does the city get the best bang for its buck through the nonprofits that provide those services or would you recommend increasing city staff to provide such services?
Complex, compound questions can be tricky for both seasoned politicians and newcomers. Experienced politicians will sidestep parts of the question, while new candidates may struggle to provide clear answers due to lack of knowledge or experience, resorting to vague statements to avoid embarrassment. Neither helps voters make informed decisions. For clearer answers, forums should pose simple, open-ended questions. Providing questions in advance could also lead to better responses. While spontaneous answers can reveal a candidate’s values and superficial knowledge (gotcha!), they don’t necessarily reflect their critical thinking on specific topics like Town Center, Red Gate Park, or the city budget.

But even if questions are provided in advance, some candidates will be unprepared. The October 5 Candidate Forum addressed the referenda questions on the November ballot, which have been discussed by Mayor and Council for the last year (see Board of Supervisors of Elections Recommends Lowering Voting Age to 16 and Mayor and Council to Choose Earmarks and Decide Upcoming Election Changes), so every candidate should be prepared with an answer. The issues of lowering the voting age to 16, permitting noncitizens to vote, setting term limits, and creating representative districts are quite familiar to Council Members David Myles and Monique Ashton, yet were strangely unwilling to state their conclusions. In his closing remarks, Myles stated that “voting is private matter” and provided an “outline of his philosophy” so that voters might guess at his answers (perhaps he prefers that the City Council vote in secret?). Mayoral candidate Monique Ashton held up an illegible handwritten sign that elicited groans from the audience, who eventually was asked to read it out: “I will listen, convene, and do what I think is best for Rockville.” It’s a non-answer that anyone running for office can spout, but certainly not appropriate for a current council member running for mayor. Voters “hire” the Mayor and Council to lead the city; we need to know what you think and where you’re taking us.

Finally, the strangest event of the week occurred after the October 5 Forum in the parking lot. I ran into a candidate for the Rockville council who pointed out an error in my post about their voting record. They told me they had voted in the 2019 election and thought I had used an incorrect 2019 voter list provided by the City of Rockville. They also mentioned that they had notified the City Clerk about this mistake. So, on October 6, I contacted the City Clerk’s office to request an updated voter list, as the one they gave me in September 2023 seemed to be incorrect. They responded quickly, but instead of giving me a corrected list, they directed me to the State of Maryland. This was very strange. The City Clerk’s Office didn’t show any concern about the potential error in the 2019 voter list—it could suggest there are errors in the voter list for the upcoming election. Hmm. There are several ways to get at this without the City’s cooperation. It’s slow and costly, but I’ll keep at it. Hopefully, I’ll have answers before the election.
Candidate Forums: The Heart of the Rockville City Council Race

The race for Rockville City Council is gaining momentum, with candidate forums being among the most intriguing events. These forums provide an opportunity for each candidate to answer questions on various issues. While sometimes referred to as “debates,” they rarely involve direct exchanges between candidates or in-depth discussions. However, they do provide a platform for comparing candidates and understanding their stances. Their responses may be rough and awkward at times, yet this rawness often provides more insight into their true beliefs and intentions, unlike the polished and often vague statements we typically hear from elected officials in Congress.
The City of Rockville has selected the candidate forums that will be broadcast on Rockville 11 and YouTube, but everyone is welcome to attend in person:
Tuesday, September 26 from 2-3:30 pm at the Thomas Farm Community Center, hosted by the Greater Rockville Chamber of Commerce.
Thursday, October 5 from 7-8:30 pm at F. Scott Fitzgerald Theatre, hosted by Community Reach of Montgomery County with Rainbow Place Shelter.
Thursday, October 12 from noon to 1:30 pm at the Rockville Senior Center, hosted by the League of Women Voters of Montgomery County.
The hosting organization determines the format and questions, and obviously, each has a different interest so the topics will vary among the forums.
Other community organizations and neighborhood associations will host their own forums. Usually everyone is welcome and some will be broadcast, so look for announcements on a candidate’s or organization’s web sites or social media pages.
There are currently two candidates for mayor and nine candidates for council. If you are interested in serving, there is still time to get on the ballot. Petitions need to be signed by as least 100 registered voters who live in Rockville and submitted by this Friday, September 8. More details at Running for Office on the City web site.
Starting today until Election Day, I will close comments on this blog. Unfortunately, elections can bring out the worst in people and the blog comments become a place for slinging mud and venom. Question every fact and assertion from candidates, expect the stealing of yard signs, and know that impersonators will lurk on social media. Yes, in Rockville. Sigh.
Can You Buy Your Way onto City Council?

Election campaigns, even small local ones like Rockville City Council, require time and money. With the absence of a local newspaper to reach voters, candidates have to either spend most of their time walking door to door or most of their funds to print and mail campaign literature. In 2019—the last election for Mayor and Council—candidates for Council spent from $424 to $48,776 on their campaigns. Does money matter in local elections? Absolutely, under the right conditions.
As can be seen in the chart above, the candidates who spent the most money (Ashton, Feinberg, Myles, and Pierzchala) were elected to City Council—with one notable exception (Gottfried). The difference? Gottfried had less than a handful of individual contributors to his campaign; his campaign was mostly self-funded. The successful candidates had lots of money and contributors, and those who tended to spend less per vote had more Rockville residents as supporters. I suspect local supporters are more influential on the election than contributors who live out of town.
Looking more closely, successful candidates in 2019 needed at least 5,000 votes and spent between $3 to $10 per vote. In other words, to win a City Council election in Rockville required $15,000 to $50,000—mostly raised from local residents. If a candidate can’t raise those funds locally, they will need to put in a lot of their own money. At the other end of the spectrum, small campaigns who spent $500 to $5,000 didn’t have the capacity to gain sufficient support to cross the 5,000-vote threshold. If there are candidates you’d love to see on City Council, give them your financial support. A contribution of $25, $50, or $100 can make a big difference, especially in September.
The middle-sized campaign of $2 to $5 per voter ($10,000 to $20,000) seem to rely not only on the number of local contributors but also a thoughtfully-crafted campaign. To get out the vote, candidates have lots of ways to spend money (mail, literature, photography, videos, buttons, yard signs, t-shirts, social media, advertising) and time (parades, events, walking door to door, planning meetings, Community Forums, phone calls) but some are more effective than others. Campaigns of this size can’t shoot from the hip; they have to plan and manage carefully. Cotte Griffiths, Hedrick, Lee, Mullican, and Pitman fell into this nebulous and fraught category, so this year’s candidates may want to talk with a couple of them for advice. Perhaps the enlargement of the Council by two seats will allow more middle-sized campaigns to succeed. BTW, Kuan Lee’s expenses are low in the chart but he had over $10,000 in outstanding unpaid bills at the end of 2019, so his expenses are actually closer to $13,000.
The chart also shows that campaigns ramp up in September and at full-speed in October. November is very quiet by comparison because the election is held early in the month. I suspect that Labor Day will begin the campaign season in Rockville and it will include the usual craziness of mud-slinging and dirty tricks (yes, it unfortunately happens in Rockville).
The data for the chart is derived from each candidate’s campaign finance report, which are submitted monthly during the height of the campaign season. Rockville developed its own campaign report forms and they desperately need to be revised because most candidates are unable to complete them properly and have to submit amendments regularly—some of them months later. Plus, key information can obscured because the forms allow candidates to reimburse themselves for expenses—the public can’t see where the cash is flowing, which is the primary purpose of campaign finance reports. The Board of Supervisors of Elections needs to revise the form and establish a standard of performance that no more than 25% of reports in any periods are amended.

Mayor and Council to Choose Earmarks and Decide Upcoming Election Changes
At its Monday, February 27, 2023 meeting, the Rockville Mayor and Council will discuss proposed earmarks for the FY24 federal budget, requests from the Board of Supervisors of Elections, and recommendations from the Charter Review Commission. On the Consent Calendar (items approved without discussion) are the preservation of public art, funding for the Rockcrest Ballet Center, Taste of Rockville agreement, and funding for the flood resilience master plan, among others. The Mayor and Council will also receive reports on operating budget and capital improvements budget for FY2024.
Yes, Congress is openly using earmarks again, “funds provided for projects or programs where the congressional direction (in bill or report language) circumvents the merit-based or competitive allocation process, or specifies the location or recipient.” For some, it’s simply another form of pork barrel politics but for others it’s a vital project. Perhaps the most famous earmark was by US Senator Ted Stevens to construct the Gravina Island Bridge or the “Bridge to Nowhere” for $250 million in 2002. But if you want federal funds for a specific project, the best way to ensure it is through earmarks. This year, the City of Rockville is considering several potential requests to Senator Cardin, Senator Van Hollen, and Congressman Raskin, including the emergency operations center at 6 Taft Court, police radio equipment ($1.4 million!), storm drain improvements in Potomac Woods, security for the water treatment plant, and water main or sewer main rehabilitation in an “equity focused area” (not identified but somewhere in southeast Rockville).
Preparations for the 2023 Mayor and Council election are underway and candidate information packets should be ready by May 1—however, there is still lots to be done. The Board of Supervisors of Elections is waiting for approval from the Mayor and Council on several changes to the City Charter and City Code in limbo; proposed translation of outreach materials in Spanish, Chinese, and French; adding a second vote center at Thomas Farm and placing ballot drop boxes in Montrose, Lincoln Park, and the Rockville Senior Center. Indeed, if the minimum voting age is lowered from 18 years to 16 years and the deadline for submitting nomination petitions is increased from 60 to 90 days prior to the election, the City may have already missed its ability to implement these changes for the November 2023 election.
Discussion of the 30 recommendations by the Charter Review Commission continues, this time on a more “precise, open, transparent, and definitive administrative process” for filling a vacancy on the city council after two years; adding a “none of the above” option on election ballots; increasing the size of the Board of Supervisors of Elections; increasing the number of ballot drop-off boxes; lowering the voting age to 16; and limiting the number of consecutive terms of council members to three four-year terms (but allowing a person to serve 12 years as a councilmember and 12 years as mayor—really? 12 years is plenty, give other people a chance!).
More details in the 450-page agenda packet are available at https://www.rockvillemd.gov/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_02272023-6820.



