Rockville’s Rules of Decorum on Hold
Rockville’s Rules of Decorum are now hold to allow more time for study and review. At its Leadership Planning Meeting on Monday, September 29, 2025 at 8:30 am, the Mayor and Council reviewed the agenda for that evening and removed Item 11 Rules of Decorum and Protocol.
The meeting began with the City Manager reviewing the agenda and when he came to Item 11 Rules of Decorum, Councilmember Valeri asked that it be removed because it was not ready for “prime time.” She felt there was confusion about the legislative process, explained how policy is developed in the City of Rockville, and “hoped that this brief moment of educational background is helpful to our resident community—maybe at some point I will create an infographic or short animation to illustrate it ala Schoolhouse Rock.” Councilmember Van Grack concurred with removing the Rules of Decorum, noting it was only presented to Council on Friday and the Council and the public need more time for review and comment. Councilmember Shaw also concurred and noted that at the last meeting, a councilmember asked that “we move forward with this agenda item in haste and to have a draft by the next meeting.” She had concerns that rules of decorum could also act to silence opposition, as was done during the Civil Rights Movement. Councilmember Jackson concurred but recognized that while the item was added to the agenda late and there is insufficient time for review, it is not being rushed because Council has been discussing it for a long time. He wants to be sure that everyone who wishes to speak in the Council chamber feels comfortable, safe, and not intimidated by others. Mayor Ashton noted that Council has two goals: ensuring free speech and ensuring everyone feels safe to testify. She felt that the text is longer and more extensive than she anticipated and wanted to compare with other jurisdictions and solicit responses from the Human Rights Commission. The discussion concluded with Councilmember Valeri responding to Councilmember Shaw’s mention of the history of civil rights and that her great-grandfather, a journalist, was sentenced to a concentration camp in Greece because of his reporting and thus understands the value of free speech. The City Manager will reschedule a discussion on Rules of Decorum and Protocol for a future meeting in the next six months.
Even though it was removed from the agenda, several people voiced their concerns at Community Forum during the Mayor and Council meeting.
Affordable Housing and Election Integrity: Residents Share Concerns with Council
The public comments during the Rockville City Council’s Community Forum on October 21, 2024, covered the following major topics:
- Enforcement of Campaign Laws: Several speakers, including Brigitta Mullican, Steven Weiner, and Bridget Newton, emphasized concerns over the enforcement of Rockville’s campaign regulations. They argued that a lack of consistent action on campaign violations could undermine trust in local election laws. These comments called for clearer standards and increased accountability for campaign rule violations. Next steps? The Council could direct the City Attorney to establish clear guidelines for when and how campaign violations will be addressed, possibly creating a review process for the Board of Supervisors of Election to report findings and suggest enforcement actions.
- Rent Stabilization and Housing Affordability: Numerous residents, such as Misha Clive, Grant Sams, and Wendy Murphy, urged the council to prioritize rent stabilization. They discussed the challenges of rising rent costs, particularly for renters on fixed incomes or with lower-wage jobs, and expressed concerns that the current lack of rent caps could displace long-term residents. The call for rent stabilization was framed as a measure to maintain Rockville’s diversity and accessibility. Next steps? At the same meeting, the Council held a work session on housing strategies.
- Election Integrity and Voter Access: Senator Cheryl Kagan provided comments focused on election integrity and reminded the community of available options for casting ballots securely in the upcoming elections. Her remarks aimed to dispel misinformation and highlighted her efforts in sponsoring election-related bills for improved municipal election oversight. Next steps? The Council could enhance outreach efforts to ensure residents understand their voting options and election security measures. Partnering with state or county election boards may provide additional support.
- Traffic and Speed Control on Major Roads: John Becker addressed issues regarding traffic safety, especially along Rockville Pike and East Jefferson Street. He advocated for the installation of speed cameras to enhance safety in residential areas, especially given the planned increases in residential development along these roads. Next steps? The Council could explore the installation of speed cameras or other traffic-calming measures on Rockville Pike, East Jefferson, and Viers Mill Road. A collaboration with the State Highway Administration to address these concerns would ensure safety for both current and future residents.
- Requests for Transparent Campaign Finance Records: There was also a response from council members, including Mayor Monique Ashton and Council Member Adam Van Grack, who clarified that they had not accepted any PAC donations, addressing comments about alleged developer influence on council decisions. Next steps? The Council might consider publishing more detailed campaign finance records or hosting an information session to clarify the council’s stance on developer influence. This could foster greater trust and show commitment to transparency.
These topics reflect a community deeply engaged in matters of governance, housing equity, and transparency.
Continue reading →Council Discussion Highlights Complexities of Rent Stabilization
The Rockville Mayor and Council meeting of July 8, 2024 caught my eye because it warned, “The following program contains explicit language. Viewer discretion is advised.” Of course, I had to watch. Near the end of the Community Forum, a speaker expressed his frustration with the City saying, “I hate all of you…and I hope you all get heat strokes” peppered with swearing. Mayor Ashton ably handled the uncomfortable situation by recognizing his anger, empathizing with his frustration, and then asking him to avoid swearing because the meeting should be appropriate for adults and children. The speaker apologized and the meeting moved on.
So what was causing this resident so much frustration? He was upset about the lack of air conditioning and the rent increase at BLVD 44, an apartment complex in Rockville Town Square. His concerns were part of nearly three hours of Community Forum, with dozens of speakers providing comments in anticipation of a presentation about rent stabilization listed later in the agenda. Because presentations do not allow public comments or questions, anyone with concerns had to express them via email in advance or by speaking during the Community Forum.
Many residents supported rent stabilization, highlighting its importance in preventing displacement and maintaining community stability, particularly for vulnerable populations like seniors and low-income families. Some speakers shared personal stories of financial struggles and the impact of rising rents on their lives.
Continue reading →Unlawful Meeting: Rockville Mayor and Council Fails to Notify Public
Today the Maryland Open Meetings Compliance Board determined that the Rockville Mayor and Council violated the Open Meetings Act by failing to provide reasonable advance notice of the meeting held on Friday, May 24, 2024. During this ten-minute meeting, the City Council approved two significant items—an agreement related to the development of Twinbrook Commons and the appointment of an Acting City Manager—but had posted and altered the agenda just the day prior, deliberately omitting the appointment of the Acting City Manager.
The Compliance Board emphasized that the Mayor and Council [as well as any other city commission], “may not omit an item from the agenda that the body knows, at the time the agenda is made public, that the body will discuss at the meeting. Nor should a body deliberately delay its decisions about what items it will discuss at a meeting, in order to avoid disclosing those items to the public on an agenda.”
Back in May when this began, I was surprised by the meeting’s timing and the incomplete agenda. Shortly after, it became clear that the Council had appointed Barack Matite as Acting City Manager as a last-minute addition to the agenda, prompting me to file a complaint with the Open Meetings Compliance Board, as follows:
- Lack of Adequate Public Notice: The resolution to appoint a new City Manager was introduced at the meeting’s start, without being listed on the public agenda posted on May 23, 2024. This deprived residents of the opportunity to prepare for and engage in the decision-making process.
- Unusual Meeting Time: The meeting took place on a Friday morning, deviating from the regular Monday night sessions. This irregular timing likely hindered public participation, as many residents were either unaware or unable to attend due to work or other commitments.
- Delayed Posting of Revised Agenda: The revised agenda, which included the Acting City Manager’s appointment, was posted at 10:24 AM, after the meeting had ended. This delay violated principles of transparency and open governance by preventing timely public access to crucial information.
- Introduction of New Agenda Item: Mayor Monique Ashton introduced the resolution to appoint the Deputy City Manager as Acting City Manager during the meeting without prior public notice. The original agenda listed only one item, the Twinbrook Quarter development agreement, making the sudden addition a breach of transparency standards.
Given the City’s prior violations of the Open Meetings Act, it is crucial to remind the new Council of their responsibilities to voters and to set clear expectations for government transparency. Despite the presence of experienced members, including an attorney, community activist, and a federal government executive, these issues persist (and if you read the City’s response to my complaint, it seems that Mayor Ashton isn’t helping). Considering how many times violations have happened, someone keeps giving the Mayor and Council poor advice.
Moving forward, the Mayor is required to address this issue in a public meeting and outline measures to prevent future occurrences. I strongly urge all members of Council and City Commissions to review the Open Meetings Act to become personally familiar with the requirements and establish better policies and procedures. Additionally, there have been reports of unannounced “meetings before the meeting,” which are only permissible under specific conditions. On July 1, I requested further details under the Maryland Public Information Act to ensure compliance, but no response has been provided yet by the City.
For more details, please refer to the Open Meetings Commission’s decision dated July 29 and the City’s explanation on June 27.
A Call for Transparency to the Mayor and Council
Ensuring Open Governance in Rockville
As residents of Rockville, we take pride in our city’s vibrant community, exceptional services, and the transparent governance that supports our daily lives. However, a recent incident has raised concerns about the adherence to the Maryland Open Meetings Act, a vital law that ensures our local government operates openly and honestly. On Friday, May 24, 2024 at 10:00 am, the Rockville Mayor and Council appointed Barack Matite as Acting City Manager without providing adequate public notice, highlighting a significant breach of the principles of transparency and open governance.
What Happened?
On May 24, 2024, the Rockville Mayor and Council held a meeting that was not only unusual in its timing but also in its proceedings. Typically, the City Council meets on Monday nights, a schedule that allows residents to plan their attendance and participation. However, this meeting took place on a Friday morning, an unexpected and inconvenient time for many. The agenda initially posted on May 23, 2024, listed only one item: the Moderately Priced Dwelling Unit Rental Program Agreement for phase one of the Twinbrook Quarter development.
At the start of the meeting, Mayor Monique Ashton announced an additional agenda item—a resolution to appoint the Deputy City Manager, Barack Matite, as Acting City Manager, effective immediately. This resolution was introduced without prior notice to the public, preventing residents from being informed and prepared to discuss or contest the appointment. To further complicate matters, the revised agenda that included this crucial item was posted at 10:24 am, after the meeting had already begun.
Why It Matters
The Maryland Open Meetings Act exists to ensure that government decisions are made transparently and with public involvement. When decisions are made without adequate notice or opportunity for public input, it undermines trust in our local government and its commitment to representing our interests. The appointment of a new Acting City Manager is a significant decision that impacts the leadership and direction of our city. Residents have a right to be informed and involved in such important matters.
The Violations
Several key violations of the Open Meetings Act occurred during the May 24th meeting:
- Lack of Adequate Public Notice: The resolution to appoint the Acting City Manager was not listed on the agenda posted the day before the meeting, depriving residents of the opportunity to prepare and participate.
- Unusual Meeting Time: The meeting was held on a Friday morning, diverging from the regular Monday night schedule, which likely limited public attendance and participation.
- Delayed Posting of Revised Agenda: The revised agenda was posted after the meeting had started, further preventing residents from being aware of the new agenda item in a timely manner.
Moving Forward
Transparency and accountability are the cornerstones of good governance. To maintain public trust, it is essential that the City of Rockville adheres to the principles outlined in the Maryland Open Meetings Act. As residents, we must hold our local government accountable and demand adherence to these principles to ensure that our voices are heard and our interests are represented.
I urge all Rockville residents to stay informed and involved in our local government. Attend meetings, ask questions, and demand transparency. By doing so, we can help ensure that Rockville remains a city we are proud to call home, governed by the principles of openness and integrity.
Together, let’s advocate for a government that values our participation and upholds the trust we place in it. Transparency is not just a legal requirement—it’s a promise to the community that must be honored.
Money Talks: Pierzchala, Jackson, Van Grack, and Fulton Lead in Rockville Election Funding
Who’s on top in the Rockville Mayor and Council race? If you based it on money, it would be Mark Pierzchala for Mayor and Barry Jackson, Adam Van Grack, and Kate Fulton for City Council (I suspect Izola Shaw is among them, however, she did not submit a financial report by the deadline). The status of the remaining candidates remain ambiguous, and even the initial insights from the financial reports for these four top-seated candidates warrant further examination.
Among the Council candidates, Barry Jackson, Adam Van Grack, and Kate Fulton have each raised more than $20,000 to date, allowing them to run a well-rounded effective campaign. In the 2019 campaign, successful candidates raised about $15,000. To take the lead among Fulton and Van Grack, Jackson loaned himself $20,000. The remaining candidates have raised less than $10,000 to date, putting them on roughly equal footing (again, Harold Hodges did not submit reports so we can assume he is not an active candidate). Among the latest campaign finance reports were several surprises:
- Richard Gottfried attracted only two donors, including Art Stigile, the treasurer of Mark Pierzchala’s campaign.
- Danniel Belay posted an extraordinary growth in contributions from $0 by October 3 to $5,850 by the end of the month, but only one $50 donation came from a Rockville resident. The rest came from outside of the city, state, or United States.
- Ricky Mui raised just over $2,000 but spent more than $2,500 for catering and Chinese lion dancers at a fundraiser, so he actually fell behind. There’s also an unusual comment that his campaign owes Brigitta Mullican, a Rockville resident, $1,286 for 1200 printed mailers.
The Mayoral race contains the biggest surprises as both candidates have raised more than $65,000, overshadowing the council candidates: $67,303 for Monique Ashton and an extraordinary $146,677 for Mark Pierzchala. To achieve those record-setting numbers required loaning themselves record-setting amounts in this month: $35,143 for Monique Ashton and $90,000 for Mark Pierzchala. Combined with their loans for the previous periods (both are incumbents carrying loans from the 2019 campaign), Ashton has debts of $51,678 and Pierzchala has a whopping debt of $126,500. Many residents assume that the Mayor and Council are volunteers, but they are considered “part time” positions and given an “annual stipend” of $37,560 for the Mayor and $30,483 for council members. If Pierzchala wins, it will take more than three years of his four-year term to pay back this loan. Is it worth it? Evidently, it is for him.
Compared to the 2019 campaign, the amounts raised for 2023 have reached new heights. Most of it is spent on printing and mailing campaign literatures to homes of Rockville residents, which seems to be the most effective way to connecting with voters. If the City changes from city-wide to campaign districts, it will make the cost to run for office much less expensive and open it up to more residents.
Financial Reports Reveal Top Contenders in Rockville Mayor and Council Race
UPDATE: This post was corrected and expanded to reflect the following: revision of funds raised in the mayoral race, charts clarifying loans and mayoral vs council candidates, and a minor error in Danniel Belay’s financial report.
In the Rockville Mayor and Council race, the first round of financial reports, due on October 9, 2023, have begun to paint a picture of the candidates with the most substantial resources and support. As the race for the six council seats intensifies, the field appears to have narrowed from twelve to eight contenders: Kate Fulton, Barry Jackson, Ricky Mui, David Myles, Paul Scott, Izola Shaw, Marissa Valeri, and Adam Van Grack.
However, not all candidates are faring as well. Financial reports indicate that Danniel Belay, Anita Powell, and Richard Gottfried are trailing, each having raised less than $500, a sum considered insufficient to garner substantial voter support in Rockville. Harold Hodges, another candidate, appears to be even less active in the race, having not submitted a financial report.
The mayoral race in Rockville is shaping up to be a complex contest. Candidate Mark Pierzchala has raised an impressive $48,352, but with a self-loan of $33,160 this period, his effective fundraising total comes to $15,192 (ignoring funds and loans carried over from his 2019 campaign).
In contrast, Monique Ashton‘s fundraising efforts have yielded $19,836, a figure that not only falls short of her opponent’s total but also those of council candidates Kate Fulton, Barry Jackson, and Adam Van Grack. Ashton has loaned her campaign $8,224, leaving her with a net fundraising total of $11,612, (ignoring funds and loans carried over from her 2019 campaign). This places Ashton among the middle of all candidates in this election but an improvement compared to 2019, when she had raised nearly $8,000 by the end of September.
Contributors to campaigns offer revealing insights into financial influences and influencers, but it is different in smaller local races as in Rockville. Donor analysis typically shows many candidates receive support from family, such as Adam Van Grack. However, this election reveals an unusual trend: incumbents Monique Ashton, Mark Pierzchala, and David Myles have not garnered substantial support from local residents, which would be expected if they had significantly impacted residents’ lives. This raises questions about the perceived influence of the Mayor and Council. Are their actions going unnoticed, or are they not making a significant impact? Notably, current Mayor Bridget Newton and her husband are supporting Monique Ashton, Barry Jackson, and Paul Scott.
For your own analysis, here are the individuals who made contributions of $500 or more, all of whom are based in Rockville unless stated otherwise:
Ashton, Monique: Aaron Stallworth (DC, $500), Antonio Quirindongo (NY, $1,000), Joseph Song (CA, $500), Simon Francis (DC, $1,000), Bridget Newton ($750), Fred Newton ($750), Cyrus Allafi ($500)
Pierzchala, Mark: Norma Pierzchala ($1,000), Joel Martinez ($1,000), Paul O’Brien ($500), Janet Gallant ($1,000), Carl Pierzchala ($1,000), George and Barbara Felber ($500), Benjamin Ross (MD, $500), Ingrid Chua ($1,000), Eduardo Alueta ($1,000; returned)
Belay, Danniel: None over $500
Fulton, Kate: Joel Martinez ($1,000), Beverly McFarland (Delaware, $1,000), Bill Fulton (California, $500)
Gottfried, Richard: None over $500
Hodges, Harold: No report
Jackson, Barry: Elizabeth Bartz (Ohio, $500), James “Jack” Jackson (Washington, $1,000), Peter Fosselman ($750), John Killpack (California, $1,000), Bridget Newton ($750), Fred Newton ($750)
Mui, Ricky (DBA Communities Electing Ricky Mui & Supporters of Mui Ricky Fai): Jacob Miller (Washington, $500), Mark Pierzchala ($500), Michael O’Brien (Pennsylvania, $500)
Myles, David: Duncan Maru (NY, $1,000), Tommy Roberts (GA, $500)
Powell, Anita: None over $500
Scott, Paul: Christopher Cash ($1,000), Bridget Newton ($750), Fred Newton ($750)
Shaw, Izola: Steven Van Grack ($520.87), Michael Rubin (MD, $520.87), Kimberley Propeack (MD, $500), Quinton Zondervan (MA, $1,000)
Valeri, Marissa: None over $500
Van Grack, Adam: Steven Van Grack ($1,000), Brandon Van Grack ($1,000), Claire Bohenegel (DC, $1,000), Gail Van Grack-Aks ($1,000), Ryan Van Grack (MD, $1,000), Citizens for Brian Feldman (MD, $500), Terry Lierman (MD, $1,000).
The Board of Supervisors of Elections requires candidates to file their campaign financial statements on simple yet confusing forms (or are they simply confusing forms?) that always trip up candidates and require correction (to see how widespread this problem occurs, count the number of amended returns in 2019). For this round, there seem to be a couple errors that deserve closer scrutiny but do not seem to affect my overall conclusions:
- Rockville United lists an in-kind contribution of $200 to Paul Scott, which does not appear in Paul Scott’s report.
- Danniel Belay lists $100 as a balance forward, however, there is no previous campaign finance report. I suspect this was a self-contribution to open a bank account for the campaign and is recorded incorrectly.
- Anita Powell lists $283.95 in contributions as loans but they are actually campaign expenses.
Navigating Rockville’s Election: Tom Moore’s Endorsements for Mayor and Council
These endorsements for the current candidates for Mayor and Council are provided by Tom Moore, a whom I first met when we both ran for Council years ago. Even though we don’t always agree, he’s informed, thoughtful, and may help you with your ballot choices. He served two terms on the Rockville City Council from 2011 to 2015, then served as counsel and chief of staff to Commissioner Ellen L. Weintraub of the Federal Election Commmission. In June, he joined the Center for American Progress as a senior fellow on its Democracy team. He has lived in Rockville since 1997.
No matter what happens this November, the City of Rockville will enter a new era of leadership. We’ll have our first new mayor since 2013. And we’ll have six councilmembers, up from four – and at least five of them will be newcomers.
Given the scarcity of information about the election, I wanted to share my thoughts about those who are running. With just two exceptions, I will be saying positive things about the people I’m supporting, and not much about those I am not supporting. I hope you find it helpful.
First up: I will be proudly voting for Mark Pierzchala for Mayor. I have a tremendous amount of respect for, loyalty to, and affection for Mark. He and I served together on the Council during my first term (2011-13). I learned a lot from him about the issues, but, more importantly, he modeled for me how to vote your conscience fearlessly. He took on tough issues when popular sentiment went the other way. He championed good development and housing policies when it would have been easier – sometimes, much easier – to vote the other way. He has a good heart, good common sense, and is admirably careful about the City’s budget. Mark has been a terrific councilmember who has served his City well, and he will be a terrific Mayor.
As to the Council: I will be voting for (in alphabetical order by last name): Kate Fulton, Barry Jackson, Anita Neal Powell, Izola Shaw, Marissa Valeri, and Adam Van Grack.
Kate Fulton impressed me when she and I sat down so she could pick my brain on how to run and serve. I was just about to talk about how the City budget was intimidating to me when I was first elected (but that the City’s budget staff were very kind and patient in explaining it) when Kate mentioned that she’s COO of the Federal Reserve. Yeah, she gets budgets. She’ll be a good councilmember.
Similarly, Barry Jackson and I sat down for a marathon coffee session months ago when he was first thinking about running. He’s a solid guy with great experience running the King Farm Citizens Assembly. He and I clicked on a lot of issues, and he immediately erased my concern that a candidate who runs KFCA would only represent King Farm if elected. He’ll be a good councilmember.
Anita Neal Powell has served the City for many years. She has been an effective and tireless advocate for Lincoln Park, and I’m delighted that she’s offering to serve on the City Council. On a City Council that will be made up of newcomers, Anita will bring a badly needed breadth and depth of experience. She’ll be a good councilmember.
I met Izola Shaw when we were both advocating for the city-citizen ballot initiative (which I’m going to be writing about separately!). She served the City well on the most recent Charter Review Commission. I like her, I like her values, and I think she’ll be a terrific voice on the Council.
I met Marissa Valeri when she was on the national staff of Common Cause and I was serving on the board of Common Cause Maryland. Marissa devoted years as a fierce advocate for the Twinbrook neighborhood as head of the Twinbrook Community Association. I think she’ll be the kind of councilmember I strived to be – energetic, attuned to her constituents’ needs, forever unsatisfied with the status quo, and eager to stick her neck out to do the right thing. She’ll be a good councilmember.
I had not met Adam Van Grack before this election season, but I’ve known his dad (Steve) and one of this brothers (Brandon) for many years. Adam sat down with me and we chewed over some of the stickiest issues facing the City – among them development, crime, and the fate of the King Farm farmstead and the former Redgate golf course. What impressed me most about Adam was not how much he agreed with me, but how much he disagreed with me – and how he did so. He was well-prepared to address the issues (important) and respectful in how he addressed our differences (less important, but shows he was raised well). But even when we came to opposite conclusions on different issues, the core values Adam used to analyze the issues were similar to mine, which is the most important. He’ll be a good councilmember.
Those are the six I’m voting for, and I recommend them to you.
As to the rest of the field: I haven’t met four of the candidates – Danniel Belay, Harold Hodges, Ricky Mui, and Paul Scott – and I can’t say much about their candidacies. I will note, however, that Mui supported Dan Cox for governor in 2022, which I think puts him well outside Rockville’s political mainstream.
I am actively deciding to vote against the two remaining candidates – Rich Gottfried and David Myles – and would like to provide some context for this. I know both of them, and I like both of them personally, but I do not believe the City would be well-served with either of them on the Council for the next four years.
Rich Gottfried has run for Council several times over the past few cycles, sometimes dropping an eye-popping amount of money into his campaign coffers, without success so far. He’s used that money to run very unpleasant campaigns, attacking the good will of those who confronted the City’s growth issues. Does he have a right to do that? Sure. But it doesn’t speak well of his grasp of the issues and doesn’t speak well of his ability to work on the Council.
Incumbent councilmember David Myles, who was elected in 2019 as a member of the Team Rockville organization I helped start in 2013, was involved in a domestic incident this summer in which the police were called and he was arrested. I am not judging David’s candidacy on the incident itself, because I just don’t know enough about it. It appears to be a sad and complicated situation.
But David’s response, in the form of a lengthy e-mail he sent to members of the community immediately after the incident, gave me great cause for concern. It was all over the map, kind of claiming victimhood in one section and kind of trying to be a public-service announcement in another, and weirdly dodgy throughout. The only thing I got out of it for sure was that David’s personal life needs to take priority over his public service.
City Clerk Ensures Election Integrity Amid Questions on Adam Van Grack’s Voting Record
In response to my previous blog post about the potential errors in the database of “returned ballots” for Rockville in 2019 (in other words, who voted in the 2019 Rockville election), the Rockville City Clerk provided the explanation below. Let’s be clear this is a database for the 2019 election, not 2023. I’ve worked with many City Clerks over the years and Rockville’s City Clerk/Director of Council Operations Sara Taylor-Ferrell is among the best I know. She points out Council candidate Adam Van Grack could have voted in 2019 (and he told me he’s a regular voter and that he voted in 2019, so I’m accepting his word) but not in Rockville because “his residential address on his voter registration was in Gaithersburg from 2015-2021.” She also points out that Montgomery County accidentally left out a portion of Rockville when they provided the City of Rockville a copy of the database. It was immediately corrected and we should be in good shape for the November 2023 election—but I’m guessing the City Clerk will doublecheck the database from now on.
I want to clarify information provided to you from Mr. Van Grack and posted on your blog of his voting record.
The Clerk’s office receives the voter database from the State of Maryland via the Montgomery County Board of Elections, as no local municipality has control of the State of Maryland registration database.
Candidates and interested parties can request a copy of the voter database that is provided to the City by Montgomery County Board of Elections. In early June we received a copy of the voter database with voters’ history, however at that time it was brought to my attention by Mr. Van Grack that one Rockville City voter district was omitted.
District 10 was omitted due to redistricting last year, part of Rockville’s District 10 area was split between Gaithersburg and the City of Rockville. When updating the street file tables in the Maryland State of Maryland registration system (the street file indicates the county and municipal district voting locations of a voter) Rockville’s District 10 was inadvertently omitted from some the data. This was corrected by Montgomery County within 24 hours and the updated voter database was sent to all the candidates and interested parties notifying them of the missing data.
According to the voted 2019 City of Rockville election database provided by the State of Maryland, Mr. Van Grack could not have voted in the 2019 City of Rockville municipal election because his residential address on his voter registration was in Gaithersburg from 2015-2021.
Mr. Van Grack requested an update to his current address in Rockville on April 29, 2021. Mr. Van Grack also requested an Absentee Ballot for the 2020 Gubernatorial election using his Gaithersburg address.
I appreciate that Mr. Van Grack noticed that District 10 was omitted in the June requested data, however Mr. Van Grack is in District 8 and not 10 for voting in the 2023 Rockville municipal election.
The City Clerk takes the election process seriously and ensures the voters receive accurate information, as we do not want misinformation circulated out to the voters that would question the integrity of the election process.
Per the previous email from Judy [in the City Clerk’s office], this information is public, and you can request additional information on what has been provided to you from the State of Maryland at sbe@maryland.gov.
Rockville’s Neighborhoods: A Key Factor in Local Elections?
If you want to run for a spot on the Mayor and Council, you need to be at least 18, registered to vote, and have lived in Rockville for at least a year before the election (for this race, that means living here since November 7, 2022). But when people vote, they often pick candidates who they feel are like them and will represent what they care about. So, where a candidate lives can be really important, especially if they live in a neighborhood that’s similar to the voter’s.
Looking at the map, you can see Rockville is split into three parts by major highways. To the west of I-270 is the “wealthy west,” where the average house costs more than $600,000. Adam Van Grack is the only candidate from this part of Rockville. To the east of #355 (Rockville Pike/Hungerford Drive/Frederick Road—actually, the dividing line is Metro) are the “middleburbs,” where houses typically cost between $300,000 and $600,000 and is home to Anita Neal Powell, Izola Shaw, Marissa Valeri, and Richard Gottfried.
Right in the center of the city is the “mixing bowl,” where house prices vary the most and has the greatest number of candidates: Paul Scott, Barry Jackson, Mark Pierzchala, Harold Hodges, Kate Fulton, Monique Ashton, Ricky Mui, Danniel Belay, and David Myles.
In past elections, the richest neighborhoods usually had the most people voting. If we think they’ll vote for people who are like them or share their interests, we will likely see Barry Jackson, Adam Van Grack, Kate Fulton, Ricky Mui, and David Myles take five seats on the next city council. If we continue this logic, there is one more seat available on council so it will be a tight race between Paul Scott, Anita Neal Powell, Izola Shaw, Marissa Valeri, and Richard Gottfried. The contest for Mayor between Mark Pierzchala and Monique Ashton, who both live in wealthy neighborhoods, will be more complicated. Voters will likely consider additional factors like experience, background, personality, and age.
As for age, once again this council election attracted candidates that span at least three generations. The Millennial generation (born 1981-1996) is solely represented by Danniel Belay; Gen Xers (1965-1980) by David Myles, Monique Ashton, Ricky Mui, Izola Shaw, Kate Fulton, Barry Jackson, Marissa Valeri, Adam Van Grack, and Harold Hodges; and Boomers (1946-1964) by Paul Scott, Richard Gottfried, Mark Pierzchala, and Anita Neal Powell. Most people who vote in Rockville are from Generation X. If they vote for people who are like them, we might see a lot of candidates like David Myles, Monique Ashton, Ricky Mui, Izola Shaw, Kate Fulton, Barry Jackson, Marissa Valeri, Adam Van Grack, and Harold Hodges on the city council. But the people who vote the most are Baby Boomers, so Paul Scott, Richard Gottfried, Mark Pierzchala, and Anita Neal Powell could also have a good shot at winning.
The Rockville United campaign committee, which includes Monique Ashton, Kate Fulton, Paul Scott, Izola Shaw, and Marissa Valeri, could really shake things up in the city council if voters decide they want a big change. However, it’s hard to find information about this team online, and usually, people prefer to pick their candidates one by one. But remember, teams like Rockville United can be a great way to make the most out of limited resources.
Max for Rockville 
