Zip Code 20850 Major Source of Campaign Funding–Again

Donations 2013 OctoberThe second campaign finance reports for the Rockville Mayor and Council elections for the period October 1-27, 2013 were recently submitted and they reveal that Zip Code 20850 (includes Fallsgrove, West End, New Mark Commons, East Rockville, Lincoln Park, College Gardens, King Farm) still dominates the contributions and even increased their giving by 5 percent compared to September.  The other Rockville Zip Codes fell far in the distance at 10 percent for 20854 (Horizon Hill, Fallsmead, Potomac Woods); 6 percent for 20851 (Twinbrook); and 5 percent for 20852 (Hungerford, Montrose, North Farm).   For the entire election season, 20850 is tops at 63 percent, contributions outside the city come in at 21 percent, and the other three Zips stand at about 5 percent.  Again, that roughly mimics the voting records for those regions and perhaps how much they feel engaged with the larger Rockville community.

Amount Raised thru Oct 2013

With two periods available, it’s now possible to gain a bigger financial picture of the election because as we know, money plays a big role in winning an election.  So far, about 550 donations totaling more than $85,000 has come into election (note this is “donations,” not “donors” because one person can contribute to several campaigns).  It doesn’t appear that the amount of money coming into the election will beat the records set in 2011.  The Mayoral race is attracting the most attention, both in terms of number of donations and amount raised.   Mayoral candidate Bridget Newton is in the lead with more than $21,000 raised by the end of October, but she raised less than I expected this last month.  Mark Pierzchala is the underdog in this race, putting a considerable amount of his own money into the campaign.  In the last election, the mayoral candidates raised between $21,000-$24,000.  Analyzing the Council race is more complex because of the effect of Team Rockville–I suspect several candidates are running neck-and-neck although they may appear ahead or behind in the charts.  The major donors so far to each campaign are:

  • Bridget Newton: $500 Tamara Brock
  • Mark Pierzchala: $250 Paul Newman
  • Beryl L. Feinberg: $100 each from Roald Schrack, Michael and Janet Strauss, Michael Subin
  • Don Hadley: $500 FCN, Inc.
  • Tom Moore: $700 Howard Clark
  • Virginia Onley: $175 Eliot Bernold
  • Julie Palakovich Carr: $100 each from Wyatt McGuire, Kateri Michos, Roald Schrack
  • Claire Marcuccio Whitaker: $1000 Howard Kimel

Although Zip Code 20850 provides a majority of the support for each of the candidates, the balance varies considerably.  Feinberg and Palakovich Carr have the greatest diversity, with a significant percentage of donors from the other Rockville Zips.  Whitaker stands at the opposite extreme, with no financial support from Zip Codes 20852 or 20854.   It’ll be interesting to see if the voting patterns mimic the funding patterns.  For example, Twinbrook (20851) gave most of their financial support to Feinberg and Palakovich Carr but will they also turn out at the same rate on Election Day?

Donors by Zip thru 2013 Oct

In Rockville, the campaign fund reports are required but are not reviewed or audited by the City or any committee, such as the Board of Supervisors of Elections.  No one verifies their accuracy or completeness.  They are simply accepted by the City Clerk’s office and posted online.  Citizens are expected to analyze the reports by themselves and draw their own conclusions.

My analysis provides an introductory overview to the money involved in the current election.  I encourage you to examine the campaign reports to determine if candidates are honest and fair or subject to undue influence by a certain faction or interest.  At the Board of Supervisors of Elections meeting on October 30, they noted several inconsistencies in reporting such as the accounting for PayPal, totals from one page didn’t agree with another, and one candidate had several contributions reported in the second period rather than the first.  After some discussion whether these were minor or serious problems, they seemed to agree they were minor because the information could be found with little effort.

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: