Category Archives: Traffic

Questions from Erik Read

I am compiling candidate responses to the following question of concern to myself and a variety of other voters. I will publish said responses online so that other voters will have an opportunity to be informed. If you do not respond within a week, I will simply note your lack of response, then edit it in retrospectively, should you eventually provide answers.

Question 1:
Potable municipal water is becoming more expensive to provide to the citizens of Rockville due to several factors. Much of the potable water is used for lawn and garden maintenance when untreated water would suffice. Amazingly, rainfall running off our roofs can be used for such watering if it can be collected and stored. Unfortunately for me, my Home Owners Association has a rule prohibiting the installation of rain barrels. As a city council member how would you ensure that rain barrels cannot be barred by HOA rules? Conversely, if you oppose rain barrels, please explain why.

Question 2:
The threat of global warming requires action by individual citizens to reduce their carbon footprint and rising electricity prices add further incentive to reduce electricity use. One of the major electricity consuming appliances in the home is the clothes dryer, which also causes in accelerated wear and tear of ones fabrics. It is surprising that Rockville’s efforts to promote a greener future have not included the removal of the ordinance which outlaws the line drying of clothing on private property. Do you support line drying as an energy efficient way to dry clothing? Do you support the removal of any city rules barring line drying? Please explain.

Question 3:
The few residents of West Argyle Street have petitioned the city for and received substantial changes to the traffic pattern over recent years. While some of the changes were necessary, others detrimentally impacted a large number of Rockville residents in Linfield, Hungerford, Waddington Park, Fireside and Courthouse Walk. The no left turn from West Argyle onto Maryland Avenue between the hours of 7AM and 9 AM targets local resident commuters forcing them to take a longer, more congested alternative route that consumes more time and adversely affects their property values. There is no evidence that cut-through traffic has been substantially affected by this turn restriction. As a member of city council how would you address the concerns of the far greater number of voters that have been adversely affected?

My response:

These are such big questions, I’d like to respond to them as a regular post rather than have them get overlooked in the FAQ section. After I post my responses, I’ll remove it from this section to avoid confusion.

Corridor Cities Transitway’s impact on King Farm

The October edition of the King Farm Chronicle, the community’s monthly newspaper which is mailed to over 3,500 homes within King Farm, will feature the upcoming Rockville City election.  They asked the candidates to provide answers to four questions, limiting our response to 250 words or less, by 5:00 pm on Friday, October 2, 2009.

Now that the deadline has passed, I thought others may be interested in my opinions (I’m happy to give my opinion whenever someone asks) but I’ll post each separately in case anyone wants to respond (they must be somewhat controversial, otherwise why ask me?).

Here’s the second one:

2. What mode of transportation do you favor for the Corridor Cities Transitway and why? Do you favor a grade separation for the CCT at MD 355 and King Farm Boulevard? How will you make certain King Farm residents have input into the CCT decisions on stations, traffic, and design?

To serve the largest number of people and to be attractive to people working in the businesses served by the CCT, I strongly recommend Continue reading →

Pleasant Drive in King Farm: connect?

The October edition of the King Farm Chronicle, the community’s monthly newspaper which is mailed to over 3,500 homes within King Farm, will feature the upcoming Rockville City election.  They asked the candidates to provide answers to four questions, limiting our response to 250 words or less, by 5:00 pm on Friday, October 2, 2009.

Now that the deadline has passed, I thought others may be interested in my opinions (I’m happy to give my opinion whenever someone asks) but I’ll post each separately in case anyone wants to respond (they must be somewhat controversial, otherwise why ask me?).

Here’s the first one:

1. Do you agree with the Pleasant Drive expansion, allowing a direct route from 370 and Shady Grove Road through the Mattie Stepanek Park and into King Farm?

If you look at the City of Rockville map, Pleasant Drive appears to be a convenient way to zoom right into King Farm. But when you stand on the street, you can imagine it won’t be so pleasant Continue reading →

New Urbanism video includes Rockville Town Square

Built to Last recently won first prize in the Congress for the New Urbanism video contest.  It’s a three-minute video explaining how the principles of New Urbanism – density, design and walkability – can effectively respond to the current environmental challenges that we face.  It may be a bit controversial in suburban Rockville but if you watch closely, you’ll see our Town Square flit by as an example (perhaps New Urbanism is already here?).

Today’s Issues

Tonight the Historic District Commission held its regular meeting and encountered a few issues that touch the larger community:

1.  The new “Green” section of the Building Code has been long overdue but as a result, should be easily adopted.  Indeed, it probably doesn’t go far enough.  The code has different levels of expectations (e.g, Rockville Certified, Rockville Silver) based on the number of points scored on a menu of tasks (e.g., if you install solar panels, you get X points).  To achieve the “certified” level, you must have a minimum number of total points, and for “silver” it’s a bit higher.  What level you need to achieve is based on the size of the building.  What’s odd is that non-residential (aka, commercial) and multi-family (aka, apartments) need to achieve “certified” if they’re larger than 7,000 sf.  Low rise residential (aka, single family homes) must “certified” no matter the size.  Actually, certified shouldn’t be that hard to reach, especially if you have any interest in saving energy.  For me, all new construction–residential or commerical–should reach the lowest “certified” level no matter the size.  Why are small office, retail, and apartment buildings exempt? Aren’t we all supposed to be good citizens and save energy?  If you have comments, send them to the City by the end of May so they can be incorporated into the next draft in June.

2.  We recommended that a home at 224 Elizabeth Avenue in Lincoln Park be designated historic.  It wasn’t a unanimous decision and I predict that the Mayor and Council will have a difficult time deciding this one.  However, what did come up was that the Zoning Code allows churches in every zone of the city, including residential.  Coming from California, this is a strange notion.  My former hometown only allowed churches  in residential zones as conditional uses because of the traffic and parking lots–it really disrupted a neighborhood, especially on weekends.  In Rockville, I’ve become accustomed to churches tucked in neighborhoods and it seems to be a good thing.  But once they reach a certain size (say, over a capacity of 100-200), they really need to move to a more suitable location on a highway or in a non-residential zone that can handle the traffic and parking, or receive a conditional use permit to demonstrate they won’t have an adverse impact on nearby homes.  Right now, churches can buy adjacent houses and turn them into parking lots, or simply grow in size on their existing lot and leave the parking on the streets.  That doesn’t seem right. (And just to confirm, I’m not opposed to churches, just excessive traffic, noise, and congestion in residential neighborhoods.)

3.  The historic Pump House in East Rockville is finally being rehabilitated into a proper community center.  There will be very few changes to the exterior but many improvements inside to allow it to be used for meetings, workshops, and classes for the neighborhood.  Historic buildings can often be reused for new purposes rather than demolished, and this distinctive industrial building provides a great example.  Isn’t this much better than constructing a concrete block box with steel windows for a community center?

And I’ll make my apologies now.  The story of the community coming together to provide a home for a single mother,  her eight children, a nephew, and a grandmother in the 1950s (this is the house at 224 Elizabeth) was remarkable, and I went so far to say that you don’t see that today.  I was wrong.  Actually, it does happen all the time, but usually not as dramatically as the moving of a house.  In Twinbrook, neighbors get together to clean up the parks and streams, work on community plans and policies, lobby for neighborhood improvements, and much more.  And it happens throughout Rockville as well.