Years ago, the working of city council and major boards in the City of Rockville became more transparent with the broadcast of its meetings over cable channel 11 (Rockville 11) and online. This year, however, we’ve taken a big step back by failing to provide written minutes of meetings in a timely manner. The Mayor and Council haven’t provided minutes since March 2015 (about a dozen meetings) and the Planning Commission hasn’t provided minutes since May 2015 (about a half-dozen meetings).
That means if you want to know what’s being discussed or decided, you have to watch the meeting, which can last three to six hours. Reading the meeting minutes is a much faster way to find out what’s going on (you can scan minutes in minutes), plus it’s a better way to record decisions (no worries about interpreting inaudible words and paper survives much longer than digital recordings). You can rely on the local newspaper to report on what’s happening, but well, we really don’t have a local paper that provides that coverage reliably. Sounds like the old-fashioned way of producing written minutes of a meeting in time for the next meeting seems to look better and better.
Strangely, the Open Meetings Act for the State of Maryland (excerpted below) allows local government to skip the written minutes if they provide video (although it looks like the Planning Commission failed on both counts because a few meetings weren’t recorded nor have minutes, so you really can’t know what happened). It’s a bad idea if the goal is opening up the workings of government, especially when the requirements for minutes is minimal (list each item considered, action taken, and votes). Secondly, local governments only need to retain minutes for a year, after which they can be tossed. Really? What business or organization in America operates this way? Obviously, the Open Meeting Act needs to be desperately revised if we want to fully understand what’s happening in government (looks like a job for Senator Cheryl Kagan). In the meantime, the City of Rockville should establish better standards and practices for providing minutes of its meetings of the Mayor and Council and its boards and commissions.
Annotated Code of the State of Maryland, § 3-306
(b) Minutes required. —
(1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3) of this subsection, as soon as practicable after a public body meets, it shall have written minutes of its session prepared.
(2) A public body need not prepare written minutes of an open session if:
(i) live and archived video or audio streaming of the open session is available; or
(ii) the public body votes on legislation and the individual votes taken by each member of the public body who participates in the voting are posted promptly on the Internet.
(3) The information specified under paragraph (2) of this subsection shall be deemed the minutes of the open session.
(c) Content of minutes; tape recordings. —
(1) The written minutes shall reflect:
(i) each item that the public body considered;
(ii) the action that the public body took on each item; and
(iii) each vote that was recorded.
(2) If a public body meets in closed session, the written minutes for its next open session shall include:
(i) a statement of the time, place, and purpose of the closed session;
(ii) a record of the vote of each member as to closing the session;
(iii) a citation of the authority under § 3-305 of this subtitle for closing the session; and
(iv) a listing of the topics of discussion, persons present, and each action taken during the session.
Well said. I agree that minutes should always be required and should always be timely.
Max, I couldn’t agree with you more. Just look at the Board of Supervisors of Elections – they haven’t posted any minutes in 2015 and this is an election year! I have complained about minutes, written the Clerk and City Attorney, with no satisfaction. If anyone wants to see what minutes should look like, you need to go back to those written by former City Clerk Glenda Evans
As for other parts of the OMA, the exception to go into closed session when seeking legal counsel is wide enough to drive a truck through, and our City Attorney takes advantage of it way too often.
Thanks for bringing this to everyone’s attention. Why is this happening? Is the council ok with it? Is more staff needed?